Handout (722.7 kB)
The performance of both models in terms of tropical cyclone track and intensity predictions has been verified against the best track dataset from HKO. Both models exhibit similar skills in track prediction, with JMA-NHM exhibiting a smaller average track error over the first 36 hours of prediction. On the other hand, WRF-ARW produces more accurate intensity forecasts due to a more efficient spin-up of tropical cyclone circulation than JMA-NHM. Both models have achieved appreciable improvement over the corresponding predictions from JMA GSM. The quantitative precipitation forecasts from both models have also been verified against the precipitation analysis based on passive microwave satellites. Judging from the bias score, equitable threat score and root mean squared error, WRF-ARW generally performs better than JMA-NHM in the quantitative precipitation forecasts of daily rainfall amounts, though the former tends to over-predict the occurrence of light rain. In terms of computational efficiency, WRF-ARW displays an advantage over JMA-NHM.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner