Although many LCZ maps have been produced by these two methods, there exist few studies comparing the two. The study area for this report will be Hong Kong. This offers two major advantages: because most of LCZ classes can be found in Hong Kong and all the required data for both methods are available in the city. This paper attempts to evaluate the reliability of these two methods.
The comparison between the two methods will focus on their LCZ maps. First, the spatial distribution and patterns of each LCZ class will be discussed in comparison with the real urban morphology of Hong Kong. Second, parameters such as building height and impervious and pervious surface fractions will be extracted from the LCZ map generated by the WUDAPT method, and then compared with the corresponding values calculated in the GIS-based method.
Keywords: Local Climate Zone; comparison; GIS; WUDAPT
Reference:
[1] Stewart, I. D., & Oke, T. R. (2012). Local climate zones for urban temperature studies. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(12), 1879-1900.