Friday, 24 May 2002: 8:45 AM
Comparison of open-path and closed-path eddy covariance system
During 54 days in Summer 2000 CO2 and energy fluxes were measured with an open-path (OP, Licor Li7500) and a closed-path (CP, Licor Li6262) based eddy covariance system at a young ponderosa pine site. Good agreement between measured half-hour CO2 fluxes by the open-path (Fc.op) and the closed-path (Fc.cp) based system were found (Fc.cp=1.033 * Fc.op + 0.706 µmol m-2 s-1, n=2475, r2=0.95) , but consistent small differences are evident at night, with the CP system estimating ~1.0 µmol m-2 s-1 higher respiration on average. Daytime differences between the OP and CP systems were smaller, with the CP system estimating ~0.4 µmol m-2 s-1 lower Fc during the daytime. Overall differences between OP and CP systems appeared to be systematic and lead to a significant different estimate of cumulative net ecosystem exchange (NEE). Cumulative NEE over the 54 days was a net uptake of -33 gC m-2 for the CP system and -72 gC m-2 for the OP system, i.e. the CP estimate was 54% smaller than the OP estimate. Additional comparison above other ecosystem (Winter wheat after harvest, old-growth deciduous forest) seem to indicate a similar pattern. This presentation will discuss influences of co-spectral decomposition, density flux term (Webb et al, 1980), and corrections for frequency response loss.
Supplementary URL: