J3.2
Experiences with 0-36 hour Explicit Convective Forecasting with the WRF-ARW Model: A Vision of the Future?
In an effort to measure our current progress, these forecasts were compared to guidance offered by the operational 12 km ETA, which employed convective parameterization. Using various subjective measures of forecast quality, evidence exists that there is significant value-added from the high-resolution forecasts as regards forecasts of convective mode and propagation. Significant benefits may also be evident when considering the climatological aspects of convection, where representing convective processes ``explicitly'' seems to be critical to properly representing the diurnal cycle and convective episodes. However, value-added is less obvious when considering more general guidance as to timing, location and overall intensity of convective outbreaks.
This presentation will go on to highlight current known limitations as regards existing physics packages (i.e., pbl, microphysics, etc.) when applied at such high resolutions, as well as the need for a better representation of the initial state at the mesoscale, including, among other factors, a better representation of atmospheric moisture and the inclusion of ongoing convection.