6.8
A comparison of 3D-Var and Ensemble Data Assimilation Methods Using the NCEP GFS
A comparison of 3D-Var and Ensemble Data Assimilation Methods Using the NCEP GFS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609d8/609d857ef9fbdd02ff789de593f411003962fd6c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53aa3/53aa3e5d385112d3ae4a57d53c772254700ad3aa" alt=""
Wednesday, 1 February 2006: 10:45 AM
A comparison of 3D-Var and Ensemble Data Assimilation Methods Using the NCEP GFS
A405 (Georgia World Congress Center)
A comparison is presented between 3D-Var and an ensemble-based data assimilation method using real observations in a global forecast model. The observation data consists of NCEP's operational data stream with the exception of the satellite radiance data. The forecast model is a 2004 version of NCEP's GFS model, run at T62 resolution. The ensemble data assimilation method is the ensemble square-root filter (EnSRF), run with a 100-member ensemble and tested with three different model error parameterizations. We demonstrate that the EnSRF produces slightly improved analyses relative to 3D-Var, measured in the fit of 6-h to radiosondes or 2-day forecasts to analyses. This demonstrates the potential operational feasibility of ensemble filters for operational atmospheric data assimilation.