Presentation PDF (256.5 kB)
We suggest that, theoretically, k should depend on the roughness Reynolds number R*, as others have reported. And in fact, both data sets show that k depends dramatically on R*. That correlation seems to be totally fictitious, however. Evaluating both k and R* requires some of the same measured variables, the friction velocity u*, for example. Our mathematical analysis based on the assumption that none of these variables are correlated shows that, because k and R* share variables, the fictitious correlation between the two is essentially the same as what we see in the data.
On the other hand, when we evaluate R* from a bulk flux algorithm, k shows virtually no correlation with this bulk roughness Reynolds number. Consequently, we have over 600 individual measurements of k that scatter between 0.25 and 0.55well beyond our experimental precisionand we have no obvious explanation why.