J11.2 Separating the chemical And dynamical contributions to ozone change

Friday, 17 June 2005: 10:50 AM
Ballroom D (Hyatt Regency Cambridge, MA)
A. R. Douglass, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD; and R. S. Stolarski and P. A. Newman

Statistical time-series analysis is used to extract the sensitivity of ozone to changes in stratospheric chlorine due to emissions of chlorofluorcarbons from the observed ozone record. The statistical analysis relies on a model that accounts for natural variations in ozone including the seasonal cycle, the solar cycle, variations in aerosols due to volcanic eruption, and the quasi-biennial oscillation. A noise term includes contributions to ozone variability due to interannual variability in the stratospheric circulation not due to the quasi-biennial oscillation. The residual circulation varies due to variability in planetary wave forcing, and studies using meteorological analyses show that the build-up of ozone over the winter is correlated with the planetary wave Eliassen-Palm flux. This variability in the residual circulation is not explicitly included in the statistical model. It can contribute to the apparent ozone sensitivity to chlorine derived from observations for 1979 – 2000.

We have investigated these relationships using multi-decadal simulations of our off-line chemistry and transport model (CTM). Our simulations use meteorological fields output from a 50 year simulation of a general circulation model (GCM). The CTM was used with these winds to produce two simulations, one in which the boundary conditions for chlorofluorcarbons and other source gases vary as specified for 1973-2022 by the Scenario A2 of the World Meteorological Organization ozone assessment, and the second with source gases fixed to their 1979 values. The same statistical analysis used to derive trends from observations is applied to the CTM output. When applied to the difference between the two simulations the statistical analysis provides a more precise measure of the ozone sensitivity to chlorine change. We are testing ways of including the interannual variability in the residual circulation in the statistical model so that we can derive the same result from the Scenario A2 simulation as is obtained when the statistical analysis is applied to the difference between the two simulations. This should provide direction as to how to account for the changes in ozone due to interannual variability in the residual circulation in the statistical model that is applied to the observed data record.

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner