Despite the apparent confidence that would be implied by thermodynamic scaling towards increasingly favorable conditions for severe thunderstorms, there are considerable differences in the response rate of severe weather outcomes, and changes to variability. To address this uncertainty, we quantify how severe weather environments will evolve in response to moderately and strongly warmed scenarios in terms of both climate variability and change as projected using the latest generation of Coupled-Model Intercomparison Project Version 6 (CMIP6) data. We use both physical model proxies and newly developed hierarchical machine learning approaches to environmental proxies that synoptic-scale clustering and profile characteristics to explore how changes manifest across time and the 12 ensemble members. Results highlight that increases over the Northern and Western hemispheres are not necessarily reflective of changes in the subtropics and Southern hemisphere, and the rate of response can be dependent on the environmental proxy used. Variability across the CMIP6 ensemble in terms of synoptic processes is much larger than might be expected from prior studies. While the driving mechanism of projected changes are strong increases in CAPE, these changes can be modulated by local processes, and are often accompanied by factors that either resist convection (CIN), or seasonally may coincide with high likelihood of storm organization (S06, SRH) suggesting projections may have lower confidence than previously thought.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner