Results from two surveys of the general public and one survey of broadcast meteorologists suggest this graphic is a source of confusion and highlights a disconnect between the meteorologists producing the graphic and the content prioritized by their audiences. Specifically, timing and intensity of any precipitation or adverse weather events are the two most important variables to consider from the viewpoint of the public. These variables are generally absent from the EFG, forcing the public to draw their own conclusions which may differ from what the meteorologist intends to convey.
The placement of forecast high and low temperatures, use of probability of precipitation (PoP) percentages, weather icon inconsistency, and length of time the graphic is shown may also contribute to public confusion and misunderstanding. Four alternative EFGs are evaluated in this research, and it is found that showing fewer days on the EFG and removing PoP information can increase the usefulness of the EFG and reduce confusion created by the graphic without lessening the graphic's appeal to the public.