The routine use of H*WIND to determine the characteristics of relatively weak and poorly defined TC surface wind fields during recent hurricane seasons has exposed some unexpected problems in the analysis of the surface winds. Asymmetric systems such as Central Pacific Hurricane Daniel (2000) and Atlantic hybrid TCs such as Tropical Storms Gordon and Helene of 2000 had particularly complicated surface wind structures that severely tested the algorithms contained within the H*WIND application.
This study uses "known" analytic wind fields sampled at discrete locations to simulate typical data sampling patterns near the surface in TCs. The output from H*WIND using these sampled "known" winds as input will then be compared with the original analytic fields to quantify the errors. Parameters involved in the objective analysis of the surface wind data, such as the analysis domain, the mesh sizes for the multi-nested grid used by H*WIND, filtering wavelengths, and the methods of filling in data void regions with subjective data will be varied to determine which values reduce the errors between the analyzed and the "known" wind field. This study will not only examine well developed and intense TCs, but will also look at the weaker and less well developed, but often more complicated, storm structures. Using the results of these sensitivity studies the optimal parameters as a function of TC strength and intensity for the objective analyses will be determined for the use of H*WIND during future hurricane seasons. An additional benefit from this work may be the proposal for new sampling strategies for aircraft reconnaissance flight patterns. For example, the benefits of rotating or modifying the "Figure 4" flight pattern may be potential outcomes within the framework of this study.
Supplementary URL: