Nonetheless, there are reasons to question Pareto estimates. The extrapolation from 100 to 1000-yr return period extends far out on the unsampled tail. Although the log-log plotted exceedance probability curve becomes straighter at the end, it is still subtly concave downward. Moreover, the most extreme hurricanes should not exhibit the self-similarity property that is implicit in the Pareto formulation because their maximum intensity is constrained by thermodynamic MPI and size by the dynamic requirement for core Rossby number be >> 1.
Since none the three most destructive hurricanes so far (in 1900, 1926 and 2005) caused more than $170B in damage, unprecedented destruction would probably have to stem from multiple landfalls within the same season. For example, one might envision a repeat of 2005, where Katrina intensified east of Florida, devastated Miami and then followed the climatologically likely track to New Orleans. Then Rita destroyed Houston/Galveston, and Wilma hit Tampa Bay as a major flooding event. This scenario, whose probability can be assessed using a Bayesian tree, would result in single-season damage > $440B, the combined total from the Galveston Hurricane of 1900, the Miami Hurricane of 1926, the Havana-Tampa Hurricane of 1944. and Katrina extrapolated to 2008 coastal development and population. It is difficult to imagine a realistic scenario that would more than double this figure to $1000B. Still, examination hypothetical future disasters in this context promises insight into the worst possible hurricane scenarios.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner