11C.6 Investigating the factors responsible for secondary eyewall formation in an ensemble of high-resolution hurricane simulations

Wednesday, 2 April 2014: 5:15 PM
Pacific Ballroom (Town and Country Resort )
Kristen L. Corbosiero, University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, NY; and R. D. Torn

Secondary eyewall formation (SEF) is one of the main, unresolved issues in our understanding of tropical cyclone (TC) dynamics. SEF is a common process in major hurricanes and it is known to be followed by a series of events (an eyewall replacement cycle; ERC) linked to rapid intensity changes. In recent years, a number of hypotheses have been proposed for SEF with the most substantive difference among them being the relative roles of internal dynamics and external, environmental forcing. A variety of numerical frameworks (idealized axisymmetric, barotropic, and realistic convection permitting) have been used to test the proposed hypotheses; however, it is unclear whether idealized numerical models are appropriate to study the problem, and convection-permitting studies are often case studies, preventing any assessment of their generality.

To explore the physical processes responsible for SEF, a cycling, ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) approach is combined with the full physics NCAR Advanced Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting Model to generate ensemble forecasts of Hurricane Igor (2010), which underwent a well documented SEF and ERC. The data assimilation system generated a 96 member analysis ensemble every 6 h for a basin-scale 36 km domain, and 12 km nested domain that follows the TC, which are then used to initialize high resolution (1.33 km) forecasts out to 120 h. Analysis of 48 members of the ensemble shows significant variation in the evolution of Igor. Approximately one quarter of the members exhibited at least one ERC with the secondary eyewall initiated at varying times and radial distances from the center. Preliminary work suggests that ensemble members that undergo ERCs are more intense, evolve in weaker vertical wind shear, and exhibit a more uniform moisture distribution relative to the members that do not. Future work will explore the differences between ensemble members in the context of inertial stability, angular momentum, inner core vorticity structure, and the evolution of eyewall and inner rainband convection.>

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner