The fallacy of drifting snow

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner
Tuesday, 25 January 2011
The fallacy of drifting snow
Washington State Convention Center
Edgar L. Andreas, NorthWest Research Associates, Inc., Lebanon, NH
Manuscript (251.7 kB)

Poster PDF (318.7 kB)

            A common premise used for estimating the turbulent fluxes over snow-covered surfaces is a Charnock-like relation in which the aerodynamic roughness for the wind speed profile (z0) scales as the square of the friction velocity (u*) when snow is drifting and blowing.  Two large datasets obtained over snow-covered winter sea ice—one from the Arctic, one from the Antarctic—corroborate this premise when I plot z0 against the measured u*.  But this result seems to be fictitious correlation because u* is the independent variable in such plots but is also required for computing the dependent variable, z0.  In other words, z0 and the measured u* have built-in correlation because of shared errors.  On the other hand, when I plot z0 against the u* value that comes from a bulk turbulent flux algorithm (denoted u*,B) and, thus, does not have built-in correlation with z0, z0 is independent of u*,B for u*,B in the drifting snow regime, u*,B > 0.3 m/s.  The premise that z0 increases with u* when snow begins to drift is, therefore, a fallacy that ensues from flawed analyses.