Drop size distribution – based separation of stratiform and convective rain
One-minute DSDs from 2DVD are used as input to an appropriate gamma fitting procedure to determine Nw and Do. The fitted parameters – after averaging over 3-minutes - are plotted against each other and compared with a predefined separation line. An index is used to determine how far the points lie from the separation line (as described in Thurai et al. 2010). Negative index values indicate stratiform rain and positive index indicate convective rain, and, moreover, points which lie somewhat close to the separation line are considered ‘mixed' or ‘transition' type precipitation.
The XPR observations are used to evaluate/test the 2DVD data-based classification. A ‘bright-band' detection algorithm was used to classify each vertical reflectivity profile as either stratiform or convective, depending on whether or not a clearly-defined melting layer is present at an expected height, and if present, maximum reflectivity within the melting layer as well as the corresponding height are determined.
We will present results of quantitative comparisons between the XPR observations-based classifications and the simultaneous 2DVD data-based classifications. Time series comparisons will be presented for thirteen events in Huntsville.
Bringi, V. N., C. R. Williams, M. Thurai, P. T. May, 2009: Using Dual-Polarized Radar and Dual-Frequency Profiler for DSD Characterization: A Case Study from Darwin, Australia. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2107–2122.
Thurai, M., V. N. Bringi, P. T. May, 2010: CPOL Radar-Derived Drop Size Distribution Statistics of Stratiform and Convective Rain for Two Regimes in Darwin, Australia. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 932–942.