J7.1A Perturbation Methods for Ensemble Data Assimilation

Thursday, 26 January 2017: 1:30 PM
Conference Center: Tahoma 4 (Washington State Convention Center )
Kazuo Saito, MRI/JAMSTEC, Tsukuba, Japan; and M. Kunii, L. Duc, and T. Kurihana

Ensemble data assimilation methods are widely noticed as the analysis methods which have potential to improve the accuracy of numerical weather prediction, substituting for or combining with the variational methods. Ensemble data assimilation methods have an advantage in terms of the development cost over the 4-dimensional variational method in that the adjoint models are not necessary, however, their performances are still arguable and likely have room for further improvement.
  In ensemble data assimilation, the forecast error, which is necessary in data assimilation, is estimated by perturbations of the ensemble forecast, while characteristics of the ensemble forecast strongly depend on how the initial ensemble was generated. The ensemble transform (ET), eigenvalue decomposition of the analysis error covariance matrix, is widely used as the initial ensemble perturbation generator for the most ensemble data assimilation including ensemble Kalman filter such as LETKF and the ensemble variational method (EnVAR). The ensemble transform has an advantage in that the magnitude of perturbations (initial ensemble spread) can reflect the magnitude of the analysis error, but on the other hand, it is known that the growth of the errors is slower than other methods such as the singular vector method and the BGM method. In the previous studies for the mesoscale ensemble system (e.g., Saito et al.; 2011; 2012), perturbations from LETKF were not necessarily better than other methods as the initial perturbations, which may affect the accuracy of the analysis field. Non-diagonal components in the transform matrix likely contaminate the synoptic scale structure of the bred vectors in the ensemble forecast in the assimilation window when the localization is applied.
  We started to tackle this problem, and in the presentation, some preliminary results and future plans will be shown.

References
Saito, K., M. Hara, M. Kunii, H. Seko, and M. Yamaguchi, 2011: Comparison of initial perturbation methods for the mesoscale ensemble prediction system of the Meteorological Research Institute for the WWRP Beijing 2008 Olympics Research and Development Project (B08RDP). Tellus, 63A, 445-467.
Saito, K., H. Seko, M. Kunii and T. Miyoshi, 2012: Effect of lateral boundary perturbations on the breeding method and the local ensemble transform Kalman filter for mesoscale ensemble prediction. Tellus. 64, 11594, doi:10.3402/tellusa.v64i0.11594.

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner