Convective available potential energy (CAPE) increased and convective inhibition (CIN) decreased substantially in observations during the 4 hours prior to the arrival of the squall line. In contrast, the model analyses and forecasts substantially under-predicted CAPE and over-predicted CIN owing to their under representation of moisture. Numerical simulations that placed the MCS at varying distances too far to the northeast were analyzed. MCS displacement error was strongly correlated with models' under-representation of low-level moisture and their associated over representation of convective inhibition. The over-predicted CIN in models resulted in northeastward moving air parcels requiring unrealistically long residence times and northeastward travel in regions of gradual meso-alpha scale lift before these parcels initiated convection. These results suggest that erroneous MCS predictions by NWP models may sometimes result from poorly analyzed low-level moisture fields.