The 2015-16 El Nino was generally regarded as one of the three strongest in history (it was still in process at the time of the 2016 study so the seasonal precipitation figures were not yet available) and the Bayesian probabilities, in particular, gave a greater than 80 percent chance that Southern California would be wet or very wet for the rain season, but instead, drought prevailed, extending the multi-year pattern to its fifth consecutive season. In contrast, Oregon and Washington were quite wet. Inspecting the cluster designation framework, the 2015-16 pattern resembled most closely the “Oregon & Washington Exceptionally Wet, California South Coast Dry” and “Dry South and Central California and Wet Oregon and Washington” modes, but the “Strong El Nino” Bayesian probabilities in the table for these two were each zero! Indeed, the 2015-16 El Nino behaved more like a Strong La Nina than a strong El Nino, a result not experienced over the entire NCDC Climate division period of record, and probably at least further back thru 1871-72 which is the oldest season with MEI indices.
The 2016-17 season, a Neutral or La Nina for much of its duration, brought heavy rains up and down the coast, including (unexpectedly) Southern California – the long drought pattern essentially ending. Of the seven idealized modes, the closest affinity was to the “Oregon & Washington Exceptionally Wet, California South Coast Dry” pattern, one with conditional probabilities of 7.1% for La Nina’s 2.5% for Neutrals); yet in the case of 2016-17, all of the twelve divisions had above average July-June rainfall, a rare occurrence for the near Pacific Coast. In fact, the lowest standardized anomaly of the twelve, +0.59z, is the highest such figure of the entire 122-year history.
The 2016 clustering and Bayesian table results are revisted, with the 2015-16 and 2016-17 results described in their context, along with supplementary graphs and tables