NOAA/EPA Golden Jubilee Symposium on Air Quality Modeling and Its Applications
    

Poster Session 1

 Formal Poster Viewing (with hors d'oeuvres and cash bar)
 P1.1What Parameters are the Most Important to Smoke Plume Rise?  
Yongqiang Liu, USDA Forest Service, Athens, GA; and G. L. Achtemeier and S. L. Goodrick
 P1.2West Florida Ozone Study (WFOS): An Integrated Meteorological and Air Quality Data Analysis and Modeling Study for West Florida  
Sharon G. Douglas, ICF Consulting/SAI, San Rafael, CA; and J. L. Haney, T. C. Myers, and T. G. Rogers
 P1.3Variations in weekday and weekend surface ozone levels: An analysis of observed and model forecast frends  
Daiwen Kang, NOAA/Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC; and R. Mathur
 P1.4Using Data from Urban Tracer Experiments for Model Evaluation  
A. Venkatram, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA; and V. Isakov
 P1.5The U. S. EPA/NOAA Partnership: Training on the use of Atmospheric Dispersion/Simulation Techniques and Models for Regulatory Decision-Making  
James L. Dicke, Retired, Raleigh, NC
 P1.6The Oklahoma Dispersion Model: An operational management tool for determining near-surface dispersion conditions for agricultural practices across Oklahoma  
J. D. Carlson, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK; and D. S. Arndt
 P1.7The impact of different PBL models on meteorology and air quality model results  
Jonathan E. Pleim, EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC
 P1.8The Gas Ratio as a diagnostic indicator of possible nonlinear interactions between sulfate and total-nitrate fine particle reductions: characterizing its performance as an indicator  
Robin L. Dennis, NOAA/EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC; and P. V. Bhave
 P1.9The EPA Fluid Modeling Facility’s contributions to the understanding of atmospheric dispersion  
Steven G. Perry, NOAA/U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC; and W. H. Snyder, D. K. Heist, R. S. Thompson, R. E. Lawson, Jr., G. E. Bowker, and L. A. Brixey
 P1.10The application and evaluation of a simulation of a high O3 and PM2.5 episode during August 2002 over the eastern United States  
Kevin L. Civerolo, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY; and J. Y. Ku, C. Hogrefe, W. Hao, E. Zalewsky, G. Sistla, and D. L. Zhang
 P1.11Testing of a Lagrangian PDF model for the prediction of concentration distributions from localized continuous release in atmospheric boundary layers  
Massimo Cassiani, Duke University and Università di Urbino Facoltà di Scienze Ambientali, Durham, NC; and P. Franzese and A. Radicchi
 P1.12Temporal characterization of gridded continuous emissions: when and where should one expect to find changes in air quality attributable to reductions in point source NOX emissions  
P. Steven Porter, Univ. of Idaho, Idaho Falls, ID; and E. Gego, J. S. Irwin, J. L. Swall, A. Gilliland, B. K. Eder, C. Hogrefe, and S. T. Rao
 P1.13Statistical diffusion theory applied to relative diffusion  
Pasquale Franzese, George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA; and M. Cassiani
 P1.14Source estimation methods: a survey  
K. Shankar Rao, NOAA/ATDD, Oak Ridge, TN; and R. P. Hosker
 P1.15Simulating atmospheric mercury with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model  
O. Russell Bullock Jr., NOAA/ARL, Research Triangle Park, NC
 P1.16Real-time weather and air quality forecasts during NEAQS2004 using of the WRF-Chemistry mode  
Steven E. Peckham, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado and NOAA/FSL, Boulder, CO; and G. Grell, S. A. McKeen, and J. M. Wilczak
 P1.17Real-Time PM2.5 Monitoring Issues and their Impacts on Air Quality Forecasting  
Scott A. Jackson, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC; and L. Weinstock and J. E. White
 P1.18Real-time forecasts of three ozone episodes by the Eta-CMAQ model during the 2004 New England Air Quality Study (NEAQS)  
Shaocai Yu, U.S. EPA/NERL, Research Triangle Park, NC; and R. Mathur, D. Kang, K. L. Schere, B. K. Eder, and J. Pleim
 P1.19Performance Evaluation of CFD Model PANAIR for Air Pollution Dispersion of Industrial Stack Emissions  
Rashmi S. Patil, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, India; and S. Gupta
 P1.21Operational and phenomenological evaluation of a 2001 continental United States 36/12km MM5 application  
Patrick D. Dolwick, NOAA/ERL/ARL, Research Triangle Park, NC; and R. C. Gilliam
 P1.22Observations for Air Quality Modeling Application and Evaluation  
Sharon K. LeDuc, NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC, Asheville, NC
 P1.23Modelling of concentration PDF from continuous releases using a Lagrangian PDF approach  
Massimo Cassiani, Duke University and Università di Urbino Facoltà di Scienze Ambientali, Durham, NC; and P. Franzese
 P1.24Modeling the effect of chlorine emissions on atmospheric ozone and secondary organic aerosol concentrations across the United States  
Golam Sarwar, EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC; and P. V. Bhave
 P1.25Meteorological modeling with advanced urban canopy fomulations for air quality simulations with CMAQ at neighborhood scales  
Jason Ching, NOAA/ARL, Research Triangle Park, NC; and S. Dupont, S. Burian, T. L. Otte, R. C. Gilliam, and L. Reynolds
P1.26Majorant filtering in dispersion modeling: theory and applications to development of Russian regulatory models  
Eugene Genikhovich, Voeikov Main Geophysical Observatory, St. Petersburg, Russia
 P1.27Integrating Observations and MM5/CMAQ Predictions to Study the Link between Climate Variability, Air Quality, and Health in New York State – Project Description and Initial Results  
Christian Hogrefe, SUNY, Albany, NY; and K. Knowlton, R. Goldberg, J. Rosenthal, C. Rosenzweig, B. H. Lynn, and P. Kinney
 P1.28Influence of Global Change on Regional Air Quality in the Pacific Northwest and Northern Midwest Regions  
Jeremy Avise, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA; and J. Chen, B. K. Lamb, C. Wiedinmyer, A. Guenther, J. F. Lamarque, E. Salathe, C. F. Mass, S. M. O'Neill, D. McKenzie, and N. K. Larkin
 P1.29Improving Emission Inventories for Effective Air-Quality Management Across North America  
J. David Mobley, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC; and M. Deslauriers, H. Feldman, C. Frey, L. Rojas-Bracho, S. G. Wierman, and A. S. Werner
 P1.30Implementation and evaluation of plume volume molar ratio method (PVMRM) in AERMOD  
Roger W. Brode, MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC
 P1.31Ground-level ozone forecasting model considering precursor emissions and heat-island effect  
Kanok Boriboonsomsin, Ohio Northern Univ., Ada, OH; and W. Uddin
 P1.32Evaluation of models of environmental processes  
John Irwin, John S. Irwin and Associates, Research Triangle Park, NC; and E. Gego, C. Hogrefe, and P. S. Porter
 P1.33Evaluating the linearity of sulfate formation in response to changes in sulfur dioxide emissions within a regional air quality model  
Michael G. Barna, National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO; and B. A. Schichtel, K. A. Gebhart, and M. A. Rodriguez
 P1.34Ensemble Air Quality Forecasting Over the Pacific Northwest  
Luca Delle Monache, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and X. Deng, Y. Zhou, Y. Shen, H. Modzelewski, G. Hicks, T. Cannon, R. B. Stull, and C. Di Cenzo
 P1.35Effects of changes in climate and emissions on emission controls for regional ozone  
Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; and A. G. Russell, S. He, S. K. Park, M. T. Odman, S. L. Napelenok, and Y. Hu
 P1.36Development of the off-line clear sky radiation flux by using the operational Eta code: applications for photolysis rate calculations  
Hsin-mu Lin, STC, Hampton, VA and NOAA/ARL/ASMD, Research Triangle Park, NC; and Y. T. Hou, T. L. Otte, B. S. Ferrier, R. Mathur, J. E. Pleim, and K. L. Schere
 P1.37Development of a nudging-based four-dimensional data assimilation capability for the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model  
David R. Stauffer, Penn State University, University Park, PA; and A. Deng, T. L. Otte, J. Dudhia, A. M. Gibbs, and G. K. Hunter
 P1.38Development of a database with embedded analytical tools for the management and visualization of air quality data  
Robinson P. Khosah, ATS-Chester Engineers, Pittsburgh, PA; and C. Crawford, K. Crist, and K. John
 P1.39Daily Simulations of O3 and PM2.5 Over the Northeastern United States for Summer 2004 and Winter 2005: Assessing Model Performance, Seasonal Differences, and the Effects of Model Updates  
Christian Hogrefe, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY; and W. Hao, J. Y. Ku, G. Sistla, L. Sedefian, B. Gaza, K. Schere, A. B. Gilliland, and R. Mathur
P1.40Contributions from natural sources to the background aerosol in Canada  
Sunling Gong, MSC, Toronto, ON, Canada; and T. L. Zhao, D. Lavoué, and W. R. Leaitch
P1.41Comparison of CMAQ Predicted Ozone Concentrations with Remotely Sensed Data  
Biswadev Roy, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC; and G. Sarwar
 P1.42Characterizing meteorology in the southeastern U.S. using Classification and Regression Tree (CART)  
Sharon G. Douglas, ICF Consulting/SAI, San Rafael, CA; and G. M. Bridgers, P. F. Brewer, and J. W. Boylan
 P1.43Assessment of MM5 application over the Northeastern United States for Summer 2002: Experience and Performance Evaluation  
Jia-Yeong Ku, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY; and W. Hao, C. Hogrefe, G. Sistla, K. Civerolo, S. Zhang, and D. L. Zhang
 P1.44Application of mesoscale meteorological model to environmental assessment  
Ryohji Ohba, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Fukahorimachi, Nagasaki, Japan; and T. Hara, C. J. Tremback, and S. T. Castelli
 P1.45Application of AERMOD Outside North America  
Dezso J. Szepesi Ph.D., Consultants on Air Resources Management, Budapest, Hungary; and K. E. Fekete
 P1.46Application and evaluation of a new in-line photolysis module for the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system  
Francis S. Binkowski, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and J. Pinto and A. F. Hanna
 P1.47Analysis and Evaluation of an Air Quality Modelling System over Hong Kong  
Christopher Fung, Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong, China; and P. Yu and P. Yau
 P1.48An investigation of flow regimes affecting the Kansas City region  
Bret Anderson, U.S. EPA, Kansas City, KS; and R. Daye and A. Hawkins
 P1.49An evaluation of air quality forecast tools for the Eastern U.S.: is there room for improvement?  
Craig E. Lengyel, Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma, CA; and A. C. Chan, J. E. White, R. A. Wayland, T. S. Dye, and S. A. Jackson
 P1.50Air quality modeling studies for thermal power plants in and around Delhi  
P. Goyal, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India; and S. Singh
 P1.51Air quality modeling for control strategy development  
Daniel S. Cohan, Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Atlanta, GA; and J. W. Boylan and M. N. Khan
 P1.52Air Quality Forecast Verification using Satellite Data  
Shobha Kondragunta, NOAA/NESDIS, Camp Springs, MD; and R. Mathur, J. T. McQueen, J. Szykman, P. C. Lee, A. Prados, B. Roy, B. Pierce, C. Kittaka, K. Schere, R. M. Hoff, R. R. Dickerson, and K. J. McCann
 P1.53Air Quality Forecast over Northeastern U.S. with 3 domain configurations  
Pius Lee, SAIC, Camp Springs, MD; and R. Mathur, J. McQueen, J. Pleim, D. Wong, D. Kang, S. Kondragunta, G. Pouliot, M. Tsidulko, G. DiMego, T. L. Otte, J. O. Young, K. L. Schere, and P. Davidson
 P1.54Advection-Diffusion Equation on Unstructured Adaptive Grids  
Nash'at Ahmad, George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA; and Z. Boybeyi
P1.55Activities towards future ESA Missions for operational monitoring of tropospheric Composition  
Joerg Langen, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, Netherlands
 P1.56A performance evaluation of the Eta -CMAQ air quality forecast model for the summer of 2005  
Brian K. Eder, NOAA/ARL, Research Triangle Park, NC; and D. Kang, S. Yu, and R. Mathur
 P1.57A performance evaluation of the 2005 release Models-3 CMAQ  
Brian K. Eder, NOAA/ARL, Research Triangle Park, NC; and A. Wyatt
 P1.58A comparison of wind velocities in complex terrain between modeling and measurement in natural mesquite dune-lands in the northern Chihuahuan Desert  
George E. Bowker, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC; and D. A. Gillette
P1.59A comparison between integrated meteo-diffusive models: RAMS-AERMOD/RAMS-HYPACT  
Giovanni Latini, Università politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; and G. Passerini, R. Cocci Grifoni, and S. Tascini
 P1.60Prediction of the Allowed Sulphur Content in the Fuel Used by the Power Stations in Kuwait  
A.A. Ramadan, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Safat, Kuwait; and M. Al-Sudairawi and S. AlHajraf

Tuesday, 20 September 2005: 6:30 PM-9:00 PM, Imperial I, II, III

* - Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting

Browse or search the entire meeting