21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms and 19th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction

Thursday, 15 August 2002: 5:15 PM
An exploration of several techniques to try to improve warm season rainfall forecasts in the Upper Midwest
William A. Gallus Jr., Iowa State University, Ames, IA; and M. Segal and B. R. Temeyer
The ability of high resolution NCEP Eta model simulations and neural network techniques to improve warm season QPF in the Upper Midwest was explored. Numerous variations of the Eta model were run with 10 km grid spacing, and skill scores were computed for over 60 6-hour periods of active convective system rainfall from 23 cases. Modifications were made to model's initial conditions to use a cold pool initialization scheme, to include mesonetwork surface observations using the model's own vertical diffusion formulation to assimilate the surface data into a deeper layer, and to eliminate dry layers at points covered by radar echo. All modifications were implemented in runs using both the Betts-Miller-Janjic (BMJ) and Kain-Fritsch (KF) convective parameterizations. In all cases, 14-18 variants in the model initialization/moist physics were used, creating a high-grid resolution (10 km) ensemble.

The mesoscale initialization adjustments did not consistently improve skill scores by a large amount, although their impact for individual cases was occasionally large. In general, the only statistically significant improvements occurred when radar echo was used to eliminate dry layers, but these impacts were restricted to amounts of 6.35 mm or less in 6 hours. Qualitatively, changes in predicted rainfall fields were relatively small for all initialization adjustments, but were much larger for changes in the convective scheme used. Some impacts showed a dependence on the larger scale synoptic forcing. For instance, in strongly-forced cases, the BMJ runs performed better.

Evaluations of ensembles made up of the variants showed that skill scores were higher for the ensembles than any single deterministic run, but improvements were modest. Runs using the same convective scheme clustered together, with the observed amount often falling between the BMJ predictions and the KF predictions. This suggests better ensemble guidance will require the use of multiple models or additional convective schemes. In other tests using the output of various ensemble members in a more deterministic sense, it was found that the probability of receiving rainfall above a certain threshold is indeed higher when multiple model members forecast it there. In addition, the probability of receiving rainfall exceeding a given threshold is higher in those areas where a model forecasts rainfall exceeding an even heavier threshold.

Finally, we have also investigated rainfall prediction using a neural network system. Training the network on 32 weather parameters derived from rawinsonde data and operational Eta model output over three years for Omaha, Nebraska and Davenport, Iowa, we found that the network outperforms substantially both the 10 km Eta model and operational Eta model for 24 hour QPF and probability of precipitation forecasts.

Supplementary URL: