COAMPS and the C&V algorithms were found to compare favorably with the visible satellite imagery. In many cases, the structure of the coastal stratus was well represented along the coast, and the periodicity of the cloud coverage was well captured by the model. In contrast, statistical comparisons with the individual stations suggest that the model and algorithms performed very poorly. Occurences of low ceiling and low visibility are underpredicted by the algorithm at KMRY, KSBP, and KLAX and overpredicted at KSFO. An examination of the grid points around these stations, however, shows that in over 50% of the cases in which the model "misses" predicting low ceiling heights, it misses by only a couple grid points (< 20 km). Other possible explanations for the inaccurate forecasts include a lack of aerosol information in the C&V algorithms, terrain misrepresentation within the model where the coastal mountain ranges are smoothed beyond the shoreline, and interpretation of the Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) ceiling measurements.
- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner