In the triple nesting 27-9-3-km configuration, convection parameterizations at the 9-km grid have significant effects on the 3-km forecast. When using explicit convection in the 9-km grid, the 3-km grid predicts a weaker rain belt located much more north of observations. In contrast, using the traditional parameterization KF overestimates rainfall, with fake peaks near the noon. On the other hand, using the scale-aware parameterization GF realistically reproduces the rain belt with the core to the north of Shanghai, well captures the extreme precipitation in the nighttime, and correctly simulates events of light, moderate, large and heavy intensity. Similarly, in the double nesting 9-1-km configuration, explicit convection at the 9-km grid causes the 1-km grid forecast underestimates rainfall amount. When using convection parameterization at the 9-km grid, nesting the 3-km grid effectively improves the forecast for moderate and heavy rain. However, when using explicit convection at the 9-km grid, nesting the 1-km grid improves the forecast only for moderate rain, but excessively inhibits convection development and so underestimates the core rainfall intensity. Therefore, for a realistic forecast of this severe rainstorm, it is necessary to represent the organized convection by parameterization while explicitly resolve smaller scale convection. This can be effectively done by nesting grids with respectively parameterized and explicit convection.