Poster Session P12 VORTEX2 Results

Wednesday, 7 November 2012: 3:00 PM-4:15 PM
Symphony III and Foyer (Loews Vanderbilt Hotel)
Host: 26th Conference on Severe Local Storms

Papers:
 
158
Mobile Radar and Fixed-Location Radar Data Comparison for a VORTEX2 Case: Two Tornadic Supercells on May 19, 2010
Christopher M. Schwarz, WDT, Norman, OK; and D. W. Burgess
Manuscript (2.8 MB)

 
159
Composite supercell environments from VORTEX2
Matthew D. Parker, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; and B. Coffer and C. MacIntosh

 
160
The Tornadogenesis Phase of a VORTEX2 Supercell on June 7, 2010
Elizabeth A. Davidson, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and D. W. Burgess
Manuscript (1.7 MB)

 
161
Effect of cell merger and environmental boundaries on the evolution of a supercell thunderstorm observed during VORTEX2
Curtis J. Riganti, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE; and M. I. Biggerstaff, C. M. Schwarz, D. P. Betten, G. D. Carrie, and K. J. Thiem

 
162
Single and Dual-Doppler Radar Observations of a Nontornadic Supercell Thunderstorm on 6 June 2010
Zachary B. Wienhoff, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL; and J. Frame
Manuscript (1.3 MB)

Handout (1.8 MB)

 
163
Single and Dual-Doppler Radar Observations of a Left-Moving Supercell Thunderstorm on 26 May 2009
Mark D. Savin, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL; and J. W. Frame

Handout (935.8 kB)

 
164
Preliminary analysis of the 10 June 2010 supercells intercepted by VORTEX2 near Last Chance, Colorado
Alicia M. Klees, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA; and Y. P. Richardson and P. M. Markowski
Manuscript (1.3 MB)

 
165
An Examination of the Structure of Two Tornadoes Observed by Texas Tech Ka-band Radars During VORTEX2
Ryan S. Metzger, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX; and C. C. Weiss and A. E. Reinhart
Manuscript (913.0 kB)

 
166
The 12 May 2010 tornadic supercell intercepted by VORTEX2 near Clinton, Oklahoma
Timothy P. Hatlee, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA; and Y. Richardson and P. Markowski

 
167
Idealized Simulations of Supercell Demise Based on VORTEX2 Observations
Casey E. Letkewicz, United States Air Force Academy, USAF Academy, CO; and M. D. Parker

Handout (4.6 MB)

 
Evolution of the VORTEX-2 Goshen County, Wyoming Storm on June 5, 2009 as Observed from Simulations Initialized with Real Data
S. T. Trevorrow, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; and G. J. Tripoli

 
168
EnKF assimilation of storm-scale, mobile Doppler radar data into high-resolution analyses of a weakly tornadic supercell
Robin L. Tanamachi, CAPS/Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and M. Xue, Y. Jung, K. A. Brewster, and M. I. Biggerstaff
Manuscript (9.7 MB)

 
169
An investigation of the tornadic stage of the Goshen County, Wyoming, supercell of 5 June 2009 using EnKF assimilation of mobile radar data collected during VORTEX2
James Marquis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA; and Y. P. Richardson, P. M. Markowski, D. C. Dowell, J. M. Wurman, K. A. Kosiba, and P. Robinson
Manuscript (5.5 MB)

Handout (2.4 MB)

 
170
Mesoscale Data Assimilation and Verification of the Storm Environment on June 13, 2010 during VORTEX2
Therese E. Thompson, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and G. Romine, C. Snyder, D. C. Dowell, L. J. Wicker, and X. Wang

 
171
EnKF Data Assimilation and Forecasts of the Goshen County, Wyoming, Supercell during VORTEX2
Timothy A. Supinie, CAPS/Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and Y. Jung and M. Xue

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner
See more of: 26th Conference on Severe Local Storms
<< Previous Session | Next Session >>