Human forecasters often consider, among many other factors, how each model initializes the tropical cyclone. The adjustments made to create the early model track and intensity forecasts partially quantify model initialization errors, and they could perhaps provide some clues to forecasters about the potential accuracy of each early model prediction beyond the initial time of the new forecast cycle.
This paper examines the extent to which the adjustments made, relative to the observed position and intensity, to create the early model track and intensity forecasts are related to the subsequent errors in those early model predictions. The focus is on the benefit to short-term (12- to 24-hour) forecasts, but the relationships with forecast errors out to five days will also be examined. The behavior of several models relative to track forecasts will be described, but intensity forecasts from the fully dynamical regional hurricane models will similarly be considered. The goal is to provide human forecasters will a little more guidance on guidance at the time they make their track and intensity forecasts, hopefully improving slightly upon the consensus (average) of the most reliable models, especially at lead times within the watch/warning time frame of 48 hours or less.