Four hurricane intensity models that were operational for the duration of the five hurricane seasons between 2006 and 2010, as well as the National Hurricane Center official (OFCL) forecast, were evaluated for Atlantic Ocean basin cases. The four models include the Logistic Growth Equation Model (LGEM), inland decay version of the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (DSHP), SHIFOR5 model, and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) hurricane model. Each model's performance was assessed by computing the mean absolute error, bias, and skill relative to SHIFOR5 from 2006 to 2010 for multiple forecast times. The intensity forecasts and 0 hour verifications for GFDL, OFCL, and SHIFOR5 were obtained from NOAA's ATCF database. The predictor values as well as the DSHP and LGEM forecasts and verification data were obtained from the SHIPS database maintained by NOAA. Several predictors were tested individually and in combinations to demonstrate different regimes that were conducive to higher or lower skill forecasts. Examples of these predictors include initial shear, initial intensity, storm speed, mid-level atmospheric relative humidity, and maximum potential intensity. The results address conventional wisdom about which environmental conditions lead to better forecasts of hurricane intensity and highlight the different strengths of each model.