Data from 1981 to 1999 is used for model training while the period 2000-2012 is used for testing model performance. A forward-selection procedure is used to identify the best 6 predictors: the difference between the maximum potential intensity and current maximum wind speed (dPIVmax), changes in the maximum wind speed in the past 12 hours (dVmax), the magnitude of 850-200 hPa deep-layer vertical shear (SHRD), storm translation speed (trSpeed), 200 hPa divergence (200mbDiv), and atmospheric stability (S). The performance of the regression models using varying number of these six predictors is tested with daily and monthly data. Preliminary results suggest that 1) the regression model with all 6 predictors utilizing either daily or monthly data has a skill comparable to the official NHC forecasts as well as SHIPS forecasts; 2) the skill of the regression model with only dPIVmax and dVdt as predictors is close to that of the model with all 6 predictors, although adding the other four predictors does further improve the model performance; 3) adding additional predictors (such as relative humidity) neither improves nor hurts overall model performance; 4) the improvement of model performance from using daily data instead of monthly data is limited. Windspeed probability predictions utilizing the regression model will also be presented.
Given these results, monthly data from global climate models with only the most essential predictors might be sufficient for us to understand the response of hurricane intensity to a changing climate from a statistical perspective.