1.3
Quantifying Decision-Relevant Uncertainties in Climate Model Ensembles Across Multiple Spatial and Temporal Scales

- Indicates paper has been withdrawn from meeting
- Indicates an Award Winner
Wednesday, 7 January 2015: 9:00 AM
123 (Phoenix Convention Center - West and North Buildings)
Ryan L. Sriver, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL; and K. Keller and C. E. Forest

Climate models are valuable tools for understanding how Earth's climate system is changing, yet they are inherently uncertain. Two key sources of uncertainty include: (1) internal model variability affecting model simulations initialized from different states, and (2) structural uncertainties affecting multi-model intercomparisons. These uncertainties can significantly increase the spread of climate model projections and interpretations of potential future change. Here we compare results from a new 50-member climate change ensemble experiment, utilizing a low-resolution configuration of the fully-coupled Community Earth System Model (CESM), with results from the CMIP5 models to diagnose the skill of climate model ensembles that predominantly sample internal variability versus structural uncertainties. The CESM ensemble is comprised of transient hind casts and projections (1850-2100) using historical forcings and RCP8.5 projection scenario. The transient simulations are initialized from different initial model states, sampled from a ~10,000 year fully-coupled unforced equilibrium simulation that captures internal unforced variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system. We find that both the CESM and CMIP5 ensemble strategies have a significant effect on projections of key climate change metrics, and the projected ranges increase with decreasing spatial scale. Further, the CESM ensemble demonstrates considerable skill in simulating key regional climate processes relevant to decision-makers, such as seasonal temperature variability and extremes. When combined with statistical estimation methods, the CESM ensemble provides a useful framework for analyzing projection uncertainties surrounding regional extremes on decadal timescales. Given the tradeoffs between model resolution and computational cost, our results indicate that the ensemble/statistical methods presented here provide a useful resource for quantifying decision-relevant uncertainties and analyzing climate change impacts.