Thursday, 2 August 2001
Can we predict the reduction in forecast error variance produced by targeted observations?
Sharanya J. Majumdar, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA; and C. H. Bishop, I. Szunyogh, and Z. Toth
Poster PDF
(361.3 kB)
The Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (ET KF) is currently used operationally
at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) to identify
deployments of aircraft-borne dropwindsondes that optimize the chance of
significantly improving 1-3 day forecasts of winter storms over the continental
United States. The ensemble-based technique predicts the variance of
``signals'' for each feasible deployment, where a signal represents the
difference between two forecasts, initialized with and without the targeted
observations. For linear forecast error evolution, the signal variance is
equal to the reduction in forecast error variance, provided that observation
and background error covariances are accurately specified and identical to
those produced by the operational data assimilation scheme. However, model
trajectories and background error covariances assumed by the ET KF are both
imperfect and different from the imperfect error covariances used in NCEP's
3D-Var data assimilation scheme, and hence their signals are likely to differ.
In spite of these differences, we are able to establish a linear relationship
of positive gradient between the ET KF signal variance and the sample variance
of NCEP signal realizations at both the targeted analysis and forecast
verification times, for 30 forecasts from the 2000 Winter Storm
Reconnaissance Program. This relationship enables the NCEP signal variance to
be predicted by the ET KF, via a statistical rescaling that corrects the
ET KF's current over-prediction of signal variance magnitude. A monotonically
increasing relationship is also found to exist between the NCEP signal variance
and the reduction in NCEP forecast error variance. The ET KF signal variance
predictions can be used to make quantitative estimates of the forecast error
variance reducing effect of targeted observations. Potential benefits include
(i) making rapid decisions on when and where to deploy targeted observations,
(ii) warning operational data quality control schemes against the rejection of
observational data if the signal variance is large, and (iii) estimating the
likelihood of economic benefit due to any future deployment of observations.
Supplementary URL: