A sample of western North Pacific tropical cyclone tracks are used to calculate the consensus forecast track error (FTE) and four situations are considered: small spread and small error; small spread and large error; large spread and small error; and large spread and large error. A great reduction in FTE would be possible if one could always pick the model track with the smallest error, but no method has been developed to assist the forecaster in accomplishing this task. Rather, the approach proposed here is to reject erroneous tracks prior to calculating the consensus, which is called a selective consensus. Such an approach is shown to usually reduce the average FTE over a simple numerical consensus using all of the models all of the time.
This improvement of a selective consensus over a numerical consensus provides the motivation for studies of the sources of large dynamical model track errors. Such work has been completed for the 1997 western North Pacific season, and being extended to later seasons. Other studies are being completed for Atlantic and for Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclones to determine if the same conceptual models for detecting large errors apply in those regions. Reports of these studies are companion papers for the conference.